Ralph Nader's Take:
|Ralph Nader: The DEA Should Get Out of Regulating Hemp Agriculture
San Francisco Bay Guardian (CA)
520 Hampshire, San Francisco, Ca 94110
Fax: (415) 255-8762 & firstname.lastname@example.org
FARM AID -- THE DEA SHOULD GET OUT OF REGULATING HEMP AGRICULTURE.
By Ralph Nader
INDUSTRIAL HEMP IS one of the longest and strongest natural fibers in the plant kingdom. It is also one of the most versatile plants, with approximately 25,000 uses - ranging from paper to textiles to cosmetics. Once deemed an indispensable commodity in the global market, it was replaced by a multitude of synthetic fibers by the mid-1900s, when it fell out of favor in the United States because of its relation to marijuana. But, while industrial hemp does belong to the same species as marijuana, it is a different variety with a very low THC content. Smoking hemp will definitely not give you a high, though it will give you a headache.
In recent years industrial hemp has experienced a renaissance. Farmers throughout the world are growing hemp in countries, such as France, that have never banned its cultivation, and in countries, such as Canada, that strictly regulate hemp production to guard against even the most remote possibility of illicit marijuana production. The United States, on the other hand, lags far behind. Due to bureaucratic red tape and overzealousness on the part of the Drug Enforcement Agency, industrial hemp cannot be commercially grown in the United States.
While American farmers are forbidden from commercially growing this crop, American manufacturers are allowed to import hemp from China and other nations and to manufacture hemp products.
To address this injustice, a coalition of conservation organizations, farmers, and businesses petitioned the United States Drug Enforcement Agency and the United States Department of Agriculture, asking the agencies to allow the commercial production of hemp in the United States. The second anniversary of the submission of this petition was on March 23. Deplorably, the second anniversary passed with no action by the DEA or the USDA on the petition.
If the DEA and the USDA had promptly acted on the petition, American farmers could already be producing a commercially viable crop. According to the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, in 1999, hemp yields averaged 800 pounds (17 to 22 bushels of grain), grossing $308 to $410 per acre. These figures compare favorably to the $103 to $137 gross made on canola and wheat crops per acre.
The DEA and the USDA have decided to impede the development of an industrial hemp industry in the United States. While the U.S. Controlled Substance Act allows the import of sterilized hemp seed, oil, grain, and other derivatives, the DEA blocked a shipment of sterilized industrial hemp seeds at the Canada-U.S. border in 1999. For example, U.S. Customs requested that Kenex Ltd., the exporter, recall all of its previous shipments of industrial hemp, totaling 17 trailer loads worth of oil, horse bedding, granola bars, and animal feed, or face a minimum $500,000 fine. This seizure was apparently in response to a newly instituted DEA policy that treats products containing THC (no matter how small the amount) as an equivalent to the controlled drug marijuana. After the involvement of the Canadian consulate in Washington, D.C., and media scrutiny, the recall has been rescinded and shipments resumed.
However, border seizures of various industrial hemp products continue, making some U.S. companies wary of manufacturing hemp products. The DEA also actively opposes and lobbies against state efforts to encourage the commercial production of industrial hemp. According to Agro-Tech Communications, 16 states introduced pro-industrial hemp legislation in 1999, with nine states actually passing legislation calling for research, study, or production of industrial hemp.
Hawaii has been the most proactive, passing hemp legislation and obtaining a DEA permit to grow an industrial hemp test crop. To satisfy the DEA's strict standards Hawaii has erected a chain-link fence topped with razor wire and a 24-hour infrared security system around its hemp plots - measures which would make commercial production impractical.
These actions on the part of the United States government are ensuring that while Canadian farmers prosper from industrial hemp, American farmers are unlikely to see its benefits anytime soon.
Industrial hemp is not a drug. The DEA's intrusion into the realm of agriculture is preventing American farmers from growing a crop that has the potential to help address the global depletion of forest resources, the harmful effects of petrochemicals, the excessive use of pesticides for fiber crops, and the economic depression of farming communities.
Concerned citizens should let their members or Congress about this wonder crop.
On the Web:
Full text of the Industrial Hemp Petition: http://www.essential.org/rca/indhemp.html
Institute for Local Self-Reliance: http://www.ilsr.org